COVID vaccines were NEVER meant to stop infection: Dr. Birx’s shocking admission exposes public health failures

By willowt // 2025-02-27

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

Dr. Deborah Birx, former White House Coronavirus Response coordinator, revealed that COVID-19 vaccines were not designed to prevent infection but only to mitigate severe disease in high-risk populations.
Birx admitted that public health messaging during the pandemic was misleading, particularly regarding the vaccines. This has led to increased vaccine hesitancy and a decline in public trust in health authorities.
The CDC quietly altered its definition of "vaccine" in 2021, removing the term "immunity" and replacing it with a vague statement about stimulating immune response, highlighting the limited effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
The pandemic has been profitable for pharmaceutical companies, leading to the emergence of new billionaires in the healthcare sector. This has raised questions about prioritizing profits over public health.
Dr. Birx's admission underscores the need for accountability, transparency and a return to science-driven decision-making in public health. It highlights the importance of prioritizing individual autonomy and restoring trust in health authorities.

In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the public health community, Dr. Deborah Birx, former White House Coronavirus Response coordinator under President Donald Trump, admitted that the COVID-19 vaccines were “not designed to prevent infection.” Her comments, made during an appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored, have reignited debates about government transparency, the role of Big Pharma and the erosion of trust in public health institutions. Birx’s admission is a damning indictment of the narrative pushed by governments and pharmaceutical companies worldwide. For years, the public was told that vaccines were the only way out of the pandemic, the golden ticket to returning to normalcy. Yet, as Birx now reveals, the vaccines were never intended to stop the spread of the virus—only to mitigate severe disease in high-risk populations. This revelation raises serious questions about the ethics of mandating these vaccines for the entire population, including young, healthy individuals who faced minimal risk from COVID-19—and highest risk for the vaccines' side effects.

A public health betrayal: The misuse of science and data

Birx’s comments underscore a broader failure in public health messaging. “We’ve done wrong in public health,” she admitted, contrasting the COVID-19 vaccines with traditional childhood vaccines. “The childhood vaccines, like many of the diseases, you get it once, you don’t get it again,” she explained. “And this is getting the children to have that disease without getting the deadly consequences. That is not what the COVID vaccine was designed to do. It wasn’t designed to prevent infection.” This admission is particularly troubling given the aggressive push to vaccinate everyone, including children, despite mounting evidence that the risks of the vaccine for young, healthy individuals may outweigh the benefits. Birx herself acknowledged that the mRNA vaccines should have been prioritized for those at highest risk of severe disease—primarily the elderly and those with significant comorbidities. Instead, she revealed that vaccines were rolled out to “young people at hospitals” before reaching “elderly people in nursing homes.” “That is not following the science and data,” she said. “When we don’t match what we do in public health to the science and the data, that is when we get into trouble.” This mismanagement has had dire consequences. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since the pandemic began, according to Birx, and public trust in health authorities has eroded. Critics on social media were quick to condemn Birx’s remarks, with one X user stating, “She is trying desperately to rewrite history and cover up her major role in pushing these crimes against humanity.” Another added, “It’s amazing how her opinion changes once the damage is done.”

The CDC’s definition of “vaccine”: A convenient rewrite

Birx’s revelations come on the heels of multiple scandals surrounding covid: including how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly changed its definition of “vaccine” in September 2021. For nearly 15 years, the CDC defined a vaccine as a product that “stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from the disease.” However, in 2021, the agency removed the word “immunity” from its definition, replacing it with a vague statement about stimulating the body’s immune response. This semantic shift was no accident. As Dr. Robert Malone, a pioneer of mRNA technology, pointed out, the COVID-19 vaccines do not provide “prophylactic protection against an infectious disease.” Instead, they offer temporary mitigation of symptoms for some individuals. “We now have clear documentation that these products are not protecting against infection, replication, or spread of the virus,” Malone said during a panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). “The multiply-inoculated actually are having longer periods of infection.” The CDC’s decision to redefine “vaccine” is a glaring admission that the COVID-19 shots do not meet the traditional criteria for vaccines. Yet, rather than halting the vaccination campaign and working to develop a more effective product, public health authorities doubled down, pushing boosters and mandates while silencing dissent.

Profits over people: The Big Pharma windfall

The pandemic has been a goldmine for pharmaceutical companies, with Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel predicting that COVID-19 will be around “forever.” This grim forecast aligns with expert opinions that the virus will become endemic, much like the flu. But while the virus persists, so too do the profits. In 2021 alone, 61 new billionaires emerged in the healthcare sector, including Bancel and the co-founder of BioNTech, the German company behind Pfizer’s vaccine. The marketing campaign surrounding COVID-19 vaccines has been nothing short of extraordinary. As Jerry Daniels, founder of Brothers Media Group, noted during the CPAC panel, “COVID has everything to do with marketing.” He added, “It’s supposed to influence people to take action and do something.” And it worked—over 12.6 billion doses have been administered worldwide, despite growing evidence of their limited efficacy and potential risks.

A call for accountability and transparency

Dr. Birx’s admission is a wake-up call. It exposes the failures of public health officials to follow the science, prioritize the most vulnerable and communicate honestly with the public. It also highlights the dangerous collusion between governments, Big Pharma and tech companies, which censored dissenting voices and suppressed alternative treatments. As people move forward, it is imperative to demand accountability from those who misled the public and profited from their fear. The pandemic has shown us the consequences of placing profits over people and politics over science. It is time to restore trust in public health by embracing transparency, respecting individual autonomy and ensuring that science — not marketing — guides people's decisions. The question remains: Will those responsible for these failures be held accountable, or will they continue to rewrite history to absolve themselves of blame? The answer will determine whether people can rebuild the trust that has been so deeply eroded. Sources include: Newsbreak.com OKMagazine.com TheEpochTimes.com