Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Could a simple saliva test revolutionize prostate cancer detection while saving millions?
By isabelle // 2025-04-11
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
  • Prostate cancer screening’s reliance on flawed PSA tests leads to unnecessary surgeries and severe side effects.
  • A new at-home saliva test analyzes genetic markers for more accurate prostate cancer detection.
  • The test outperformed PSA in trials, reducing false positives and identifying high-risk men earlier.
  • It could save the NHS £500 million annually by cutting wasteful treatments.
  • Experts warn entrenched financial interests may slow adoption, despite its potential to save lives.
Prostate cancer claims thousands of lives every year, yet the medical establishment has clung to outdated — and often unreliable — screening methods that lead to unnecessary surgeries and life-altering side effects. Now, a groundbreaking at-home saliva test promises to transform detection by leveraging genetic risk factors, offering men a non-invasive, affordable, and more accurate alternative to the controversial PSA blood test. Developed by researchers at the Institute of Cancer Research in London, this test could not only empower individuals to take control of their health but also save the NHS an estimated £500 million annually by reducing wasteful treatments.

A flawed system ripe for disruption

For decades, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test has been the default screening tool, despite its notorious shortcomings. As Dr. Thomas Stamey — the very pioneer of the PSA test — has warned, elevated levels can stem from non-cancerous conditions, leading to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Countless men endure surgeries, biopsies, and radiation for slow-growing tumors that may never threaten their lives, all while facing debilitating side effects like incontinence and erectile dysfunction. The new saliva test sidesteps these pitfalls by analyzing 130 genetic markers linked to prostate cancer, providing a polygenic risk score (PRS) that far outperforms the PSA test’s accuracy. In clinical trials, the test identified aggressive cancers in 55.1% of high-risk men—compared to just 35.5% via PSA — while drastically reducing false positives. "We can identify men at risk of aggressive cancers who need further tests and spare the men who are at lower risk from unnecessary treatments," said Prof. Ros Eeles, the study’s lead researcher.

Who stands to lose if this test succeeds?

With its £20 to £30 estimated cost and potential to slash NHS expenditures, the saliva test is a clear win for patients and taxpayers alike. Yet its arrival raises uncomfortable questions: Why has it taken so long to innovate beyond the flawed PSA system? Could entrenched financial interests — Big Pharma revenues from treatments, or hospitals billing for invasive procedures — explain the sluggish progress? Consider the stakes: Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer deaths among UK men, yet routine PSA screening isn’t even offered by the NHS due to its high error rate. Meanwhile, advocates like cyclist Chris Hoy (diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer) have called for earlier screening, particularly for high-risk groups like Black men, who face twice the likelihood of developing the disease. The saliva test could finally make targeted screening feasible — but will bureaucracy and lobbyists delay its adoption?

A victory for health freedom and natural prevention

Beyond cost savings, this breakthrough aligns with a core conservative principle: individual agency over one’s health. Unlike top-down government screening mandates, the at-home test allows men to assess their risk privately and explore all options—from conventional therapies to evidence-based natural interventions—before considering drastic measures. Early detection via genetics could empower men to adopt dietary changes, supplements, or lifestyle adjustments shown to support prostate health, such as increased lycopene intake or regular exercise. Dheeresh Turnbull, a trial participant whose life was saved by the test, embodies its potential: "I would never have been diagnosed at this stage if I hadn’t joined the trial." His brother, also tested, discovered an aggressive tumor that would have otherwise gone undetected. The saliva test represents the best of medical innovation: patient-centered, cost-effective and minimally invasive. Its success hinges on resisting institutional inertia and ensuring Big Pharma doesn’t suppress a tool that could dent their profits. Sources for this article include: TheGuardian.com BBC.com DailyMail.co.uk
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy