DEADLY DECEPTION: How COVID vaccines increased mortality rates and why authorities hid the truth

By willowt // 2025-03-27

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

Analysis by Steve Kirsch suggests Pfizer’s COVID vaccine increased all-cause mortality by at least 14.3%, while Moderna’s shot raised it by 20%, based on real-world data from Czech Republic records and VAERS reports.
Governments, particularly the U.S., have withheld critical vaccine safety data, unlike the Czech Republic, which openly published mortality records. Critics accuse authorities of intentionally obscuring risks.
Surveys and studies, including a Norwegian review, indicate that vaccine side effects may have contributed to deaths, especially among the elderly, with some estimates suggesting vaccine-related fatalities were nearly as common as COVID deaths.
The rushed approval and coercive promotion of COVID vaccines mirror past failures like thalidomide and the 1976 swine flu vaccine, raising concerns about repeating deadly mistakes.
Despite mounting evidence, there’s been no systematic investigation (e.g., autopsies) or political pressure for transparency, leaving many questioning whether profits and power overshadowed public safety.

The COVID-19 pandemic will go down as one of the greatest medical betrayals in history. While governments and pharmaceutical giants assured the public that experimental mRNA vaccines were "safe and effective," mounting evidence now suggests these shots may have been deadlier than the virus itself.

The shocking numbers: Pfizer 14%, Moderna 20% higher mortality

According to an explosive analysis by researcher Steve Kirsch, Pfizer’s COVID vaccine likely increased all-cause mortality (ACM) by at least 14.3%, while Moderna’s shot was even worse, raising mortality by at least 20%. These figures are not wild speculation—they are derived from real-world data, including:

Czech Republic mortality records, which found Moderna’s vaccine increased deaths by 20% compared to Pfizer.
VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data, which showed 1.4 times more death reports per Moderna dose than Pfizer.

Kirsch’s method was simple: If Moderna’s vaccine increased mortality by 20% over Pfizer, and VAERS showed Moderna had 1.4 times more deaths per dose, then Pfizer’s shot must have increased mortality by at least 14.3%. "That’s a train wreck," Kirsch wrote. "In short, the cure was far deadlier than the disease."

They don’t want you to know

The most damning part of this scandal is not just the alarming mortality rates—it’s the deliberate suppression of data.

The Czech Republic published detailed vaccine mortality records, proving transparency is possible without violating privacy.
The U.S. government, meanwhile, refuses to release similar data, leaving researchers to piece together the truth from incomplete sources like VAERS.

"It’s not a privacy concern," Kirsch noted. "The Czech Republic proved you could do it without any privacy problems whatsoever. I guess in the US, it’s better to keep the population in the dark when it comes to vaccine safety." Where are the calls for accountability? "It’s not like you are hearing Senator Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren or Susan Collins or Bill Cassidy calling for data transparency," Kirsch observed. "That only happens in your dreams."

Real people, real deaths

A Rasmussen survey found that "nearly as many Americans believe someone close to them died from side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine as died from the disease itself." This aligns with a Norwegian Medicines Agency review, published in The BMJ, which found that 36% of the first 100 post-vaccination deaths in nursing homes were "likely" or "possibly" caused by the Pfizer shot. "Frail patients can benefit from vaccination," claimed Sigurd Hortemo, a senior medical consultant at the Norwegian Medicines Agency. "Nevertheless, the expert group believes that, for some of these frail patients, common adverse reactions may have contributed to a more serious course of their disease." In other words, for the elderly and vulnerable, the vaccine may have hastened death rather than prevented it.

Echoes of past medical scandals

This is not the first time authorities have rushed dangerous medical interventions onto the public.

Thalidomide (1950s-60s): Marketed as a "safe" pregnancy drug, it caused severe birth defects before being pulled.
Swine Flu Vaccine (1976): Rushed to market, it led to Guillain-Barré syndrome in hundreds before being halted.

Now, history repeats itself. Millions were coerced into taking experimental shots under the guise of "emergency use," while dissenting doctors were silenced, and adverse events were downplayed.

Where are the autopsies?

Despite thousands of reported deaths post-vaccination, there have been no systematic autopsies using histopathology to confirm vaccine-related fatalities. "They will never find what they refuse to look for," Kirsch warned. "Why aren’t Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and all the others calling for transparency?"

A reckoning must come

The evidence is mounting. The vaccines may have killed more people than they saved, especially among the elderly and frail. Yet, instead of transparency, people get censorship, deflection and denial. Will there ever be accountability? Or will this go down as another dark chapter in medical history—where profit and power trumped human lives? One thing is clear: The truth cannot stay buried forever. Sources include: Substack.com TheBMJ.com TheBurningPlatform.com