CITIZENS NEWS

Federal judge upholds Trump administration’s USAID contract terminations

By isabelle // 2025-03-07

• Judge Carl Nichols denied a request to block the Trump administration’s termination of USAID contractor contracts, calling it a contractual dispute, not an emergency.
• Contractors argued terminations would cause irreparable harm, but the judge ruled any harm was tied to contract changes and not grounds for emergency relief.
• The ruling supports the administration’s efforts to curb wasteful spending at USAID, an agency criticized for funding non-core projects.
• USAID has funded controversial projects, including $1.5 million for workplace diversity in Serbia and $2 million for LGBT activism in Guatemala.
• The decision is seen as a win for taxpayer accountability, aiming to refocus USAID on its core mission of effective foreign aid.

In a decisive ruling on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, denied a request from USAID contractors seeking a temporary restraining order to block the Trump administration’s mass termination of their contracts. The contractors, represented by the Personal Services Contractor Association, argued that the terminations would cause “irreparable harm,” but Judge Nichols dismissed their claims, stating the dispute was a contractual matter rather than an emergency requiring judicial intervention. This ruling allows the administration to proceed with its efforts to rein in wasteful spending at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), an agency long criticized for straying from its core mission and squandering taxpayer dollars on frivolous projects.

A contract dispute, not an emergency

Judge Nichols’ ruling emphasized that the contractors failed to demonstrate the “irreparable harm” necessary to justify emergency legal relief. “It’s essentially a contract dispute,” Nichols said during the hearing. The contractors had argued that the terminations would jeopardize their ability to oversee humanitarian relief efforts and cut off essential communication and network access, endangering their safety overseas. However, Nichols found that any harm suffered was “directly traceable” to changes in their contracts and should be addressed through contractual dispute channels rather than emergency court intervention. This decision follows a related case last month in which Nichols declined to block the Trump administration from placing thousands of USAID employees on administrative leave. The judge’s consistent rulings underscore the administration’s commitment to restructuring USAID and holding it accountable for its misuse of taxpayer funds.

USAID’s wasteful spending under scrutiny

The Trump administration’s efforts to overhaul USAID come as no surprise given the agency’s history of funding questionable projects. Over the years, USAID has funneled millions of dollars into initiatives that have little to do with its stated mission of promoting global development and humanitarian aid. Some of the most egregious examples include:

• $1.5 million to “advance diversity, equity, and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities.”
• $70,000 for a “DEI musical” in Ireland.
• $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.
• $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru.
• $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala.
• Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to Al-Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria.

These projects, among many others, highlight how USAID has strayed far from its original purpose, becoming a vehicle for ideological pet projects rather than effective foreign aid.

A win for taxpayers and accountability

The Trump administration’s push to terminate these contracts and restructure USAID is a victory for American taxpayers. For too long, the agency has operated with little oversight, wasting billions on projects that do nothing to advance U.S. interests or help those in need. By cutting ties with contractors tied to these wasteful initiatives, the administration is showing that accountability matters. Judge Nichols’ ruling is a step toward restoring integrity to USAID and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. As the administration continues its efforts to reform the agency, Americans can take comfort in knowing that their hard-earned money will no longer fund absurd and wasteful projects. Sources for this article include: YourNews.com TheNationalPulse.com ABCNews.go.com WhiteHouse.gov

government Trump big government lawsuit pensions progress USAID government debt