USAID's funding of over 6,000 journalists, 1,000 platforms worldwide raises concerns over independence and transparency

By bellecarter // 2025-02-08

Mastodon

Parler

Gab

Copy

The U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), has been a significant funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 media NGOs, including major organizations like Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, with 90 percent of reporting from Ukraine being supported.
This funding raises concerns about media independence and integrity, as critics argue it may lead to media narratives favoring U.S. interests, while independent outlets are being marginalized or shut down.
The Trump administration's decision to freeze foreign aid, including $268 million for independent media, has caused chaos and uncertainty for journalistic organizations worldwide, particularly in countries where press freedom is already under threat.
Many media organizations are reluctant to disclose their government funding due to fears of financial and political repercussions, complicating efforts to assess the full impact on the media landscape.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) urges international governments, foundations and private donors to support independent media to fill the gap left by the U.S. funding freeze, emphasizing the critical role of a free press in democracy.

A recent report has unveiled that the United States government has been funding prominent media outlets such as Politico, the Associated Press and BBC, raising significant questions about the independence and integrity of these news organizations. The report, which cites data from Reporters Without Borders (RSF), indicates that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been a substantial funder of over 6,200 journalists across 707 media outlets and 279 "media" NGOs, including 90 percent of the reportage out of Ukraine. This funding has been spread across various federal agencies, leading to concerns that the U.S. government may be influencing media narratives in favor of its own interests. (Related: Taxpayer dollars fueled Politico, NY Times as outlets pushed liberal narratives, records show.) The implications of this funding are far-reaching. Critics argue that the U.S. government has effectively been propping up regime-friendly media, which then peddles regime-friendly coverage, while simultaneously attacking independent outlets such as ZeroHedge and The Federalist. This has led to a situation where many independent media organizations have been starved out of business, raising concerns about the diversity and reliability of news sources. Adding to the complexity of the issue, the Trump administration's decision to freeze billions of dollars in foreign aid, including over $268 million allocated by Congress to support independent media and the free flow of information, has thrown journalism around the world into chaos. According to RSF, this freeze has plunged NGOs, media outlets and journalists doing vital work into a state of uncertainty. "Almost immediately after the freeze went into effect, journalistic organizations around the world that receive American aid funding started reaching out to RSF expressing confusion, chaos and uncertainty," said Christophe Deloire, Secretary-General of RSF. "This decision has had a devastating impact on the sustainability of independent media, particularly in countries where free press is under threat."

MSM hesitant to reveal funding source due to fear of financial and political repercussions

The impact of the funding freeze is widespread. USAID programs support independent media in more than 30 countries, and the agency's 2023 fact sheet, which has since been taken offline, revealed that it funded training and support for 6,200 journalists, assisted 707 non-state news outlets, and supported 279 media-sector civil society organizations dedicated to strengthening independent media. The 2025 foreign aid budget included $268,376,000 allocated by Congress to support "independent media and the free flow of information." Many organizations are hesitant to draw attention to their funding sources for fear of long-term financial repercussions or political attacks. This reluctance makes it difficult to assess the full extent of the harm done to the global media landscape. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the situation is dire, with the potential for a significant silencing of independent media voices around the world. RSF has called on international public and private support to commit to the sustainability of independent media. "We urge governments, foundations and private donors to step up and fill the gap left by the U.S. funding freeze," Deloire said. "The free flow of information is a cornerstone of democracy, and we must act now to protect it." The revelation of USAID's extensive funding of media outlets is particularly significant given the agency's history and its role in U.S. foreign policy. USAID was established in 1961 with the noble goal of providing economic and humanitarian assistance to developing countries. Over the years, however, critics have accused the agency of becoming a tool for U.S. geopolitical interests, often funding projects that align with broader strategic objectives. The current controversy and the subsequent freeze on foreign aid by the Trump administration have created a complex and concerning landscape for global journalism. While the intention behind USAID's support for independent media is laudable, the execution has raised significant questions about the influence of government funding on media independence. As the world grapples with the implications of these actions, the call for international support to sustain independent media has never been more urgent. The future of a free and diverse press hangs in the balance, and the actions taken in the coming months will be crucial in determining the health of global journalism. Journalism.news has more stories related to this. Watch the "Health Ranger Report" episode below where Mike Adams and Michael Yon talk about Panama, Greenland, Ukraine, Russia, Taiwan, China, geopolitical strategy, currencies and gold. This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

CITIZENS NEWS

MSM hesitant to reveal funding source due to fear of financial and political repercussions

More related stories:

Sources include: