Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Trump Administration FREEZES PROPAGANDA coming out of HHS, NIH, FDA, and CDC
By ljdevon // 2025-01-29
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
In the wake of President Donald Trump’s return to office, a sweeping freeze on communications and operations has been ordered across federal health agencies. This freeze comes in the wake of Robert F. Kennedy’s upcoming nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would mark a historic shift in how these agencies are governed and dispel the propaganda that these agencies promulgate. This communication freeze has ignited a fierce debate over the future of public health in the United States, and shifts the priorities of these agencies. The freeze, which has halted initiatives and grants across the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), comes as the new administration seeks to dismantle what it views as a deeply entrenched and ideologically driven bureaucracy. Health freedom advocates point out that these agencies, long accused of being influenced by corporate interests and ideologies, have strayed from their mission of protecting human health. Instead, these agencies have pushed bioterror propaganda that has led to mass confusion and societal upheaval, while using coercive and deceptive measures and abandoning the informed consent principle on a variety of issues that impact human health. This moment marks a pivotal turning point in the battle over the role of science, governance, and individual freedom in American life. Key Points • A freeze on communications and operations across HHS, CDC, and NIH has been implemented as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to overhaul public health agencies. • A $590 million grant to Moderna, announced days before the inauguration, has raised questions about last-minute spending by the outgoing administration. • The CDC’s “One Health” framework, which promotes a radical reimagining of human-animal-environment relationships, has drawn criticism for its utopian and anti-civilization undertones. • New leadership, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at HHS and Jay Bhattacharya at NIH, signals a dramatic shift in public health priorities. • The freeze reflects broader concerns about the weaponization of science and the influence of corporate and ideological interests in public health policy.

The freeze and its implications

The Trump administration’s decision to freeze operations across key health agencies has sent shockwaves through the public health establishment. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the chaos is more extreme than during typical presidential transitions, with stalled initiatives extending far beyond the cancellation of federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. This freeze is not merely bureaucratic housekeeping; it represents a deliberate effort to halt a deeply flawed and ideologically-compromised system. One of the most controversial actions in the days leading up to the freeze was a $590 million grant to Moderna, announced by HHS on January 17. The timing of the grant, just three days before the inauguration, has raised eyebrows. Americans question whether this was an attempt by the outgoing administration to secure funding for a key corporate ally before the new administration could intervene. Moderna, a major player in the global rollout of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 scandal, had seen its stock price decline for two years prior to the announcement. The grant not only reversed that trend but also highlighted the close ties between public health agencies and pharmaceutical companies.

The CDC’s “One Health” framework: a radical vision

Amid the freeze, the CDC’s January 17 announcement of its “National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases” has drawn significant scrutiny. The framework, which seeks to address diseases that spread from animals to humans, is rooted in a philosophy that critics describe as anti-human and utopian. David Bell, a scholar at Brownstone Institute, has warned that the “One Health” approach envisions a world where humans are seen as pollutants, with their very existence justifying restrictions and sacrifices for the sake of other lifeforms. This ideology, Bell argues, is not new. It traces back to figures like Anthony Fauci, who, in a 2022 article for Cell, blamed the origins of disease on human civilization itself. Fauci and his co-author, David Morens, argued that the domestication of animals, cultivation of crops, and urbanization have catalyzed the spread of disease. Their proposed solution — rebuilding the infrastructure of human existence — reflects a radical vision that prioritizes environmental and animal welfare over human civilization and reproduction. The “One Health” framework, embraced by the CDC, represents a dramatic departure from traditional public health goals. Instead of focusing on improving human health and well-being, it promotes a worldview that sees humans as a threat to the planet. This philosophy underpinned many of the controversial policies enacted during the COVID-19 scandal, including lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and restrictions on personal freedoms.

A new direction for public health

The freeze on operations and the appointment of new leadership signal a potential sea change in U.S. public health policy. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vocal critic of vaccine mandates and corporate influence in public health, has been tapped to lead HHS, pending Senate confirmation. At NIH, Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor who challenged the mainstream narrative on COVID-19, is set to take the helm. In the interim, Dr. Matthew Memoli, an award-winning vaccinologist and longtime NIH employee, is serving as acting director. Memoli, who previously criticized blanket vaccination policies, represents a break from the Fauci-era orthodoxy. The changes extend beyond personnel. The Trump administration has moved swiftly to dismantle DEI programs, reaffirm free speech protections, and halt the rollout of Central Bank Digital Currencies. These actions reflect a broader effort to restore individual freedoms and reduce the influence of ideological and corporate interests in government. Now, as the Trump administration seeks to overhaul these agencies, the question is whether it can restore public trust and refocus public health on its core mission: protecting and improving human life. The road ahead will be fraught with challenges, but for many, this moment represents a chance to reclaim the principles of science, freedom, and human dignity that have long defined American society. Sources include: Brownstone.org Enoch, Brighteon.ai Brownstone.org
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy