A year before that in 2006, The Atlantic published an article in which writer Joshua Green referred to Walz as "a command sergeant major," this being the same false terminology used by Walz himself. While no one is questioning Walz's service, they are questioning his alleged battlefield deployments, which he has repeatedly hawked throughout his political career in order to boost himself. "Lying about one's battlefield deployments for decades for political gain is disqualifying to me, and it shouldn't be a question," is how one X user put it. "It's still on his X profile," wrote another about how the deception continues. (Related: It looks as though the Democrat Party is once again using Muslims to try to steal another election – will they succeed?)Tim Walz wasn’t simply sloppy or inattentive to how others referred to him, he intentionally & purposefully built his entire political identity around “being a retired Command Sergeant Major” — as you can see in this clip from 2007. But he wasn’t. It was all false. Stolen valor! https://t.co/fAcXbleCDZ pic.twitter.com/36fKkQvdov
— Matt Beebe (@TheMattBeebe) August 11, 2024
U.K. to classify ONLINE MISOGYNY as a national security threat
By Ramon Tomey // Share
British Labour government to ban “silent prayer” near abortion clinics
By Belle Carter // Share
Trump says he’s willing to offer RFK Jr. a role in his administration if elected in November
By Laura Harris // Share
Sacrilege and statecraft: How Christian Zionism distorts scripture to serve empire
By newseditors // Share
Idaho shooting could be Mossad false flag ahead of new Israeli war with Iran
By finnheartley // Share
RFK Jr. pushes wearable tech mandate: Empowerment or digital enslavement?
By finnheartley // Share
Iran's nuclear ambitions persist despite strikes, IAEA warns
By bellecarter // Share
Iran bans IAEA inspectors, shuts down surveillance in nuclear standoff with West
By isabelle // Share